My chosen organization is Cornerstone Family Healthcare, a multicultural organization.
Here is my PICOT question.
In adult patients with type II diabetes in a family healthcare center (P), how do self-management education programs (I) compare to traditional education (C) influence A1C level over a period of 6 months?
Population/Patient problem: Adult patients with type 2 diabetes in a family healthcare center
Intervention: self-management education programs
Comparison: traditional education
Outcome: Influence AIC level
Time: 6 months period
See attachment for the “Organizational Culture and Readiness for System-Wide Integration of Evidence-Based Practice Survey”
Details:
Before making a case for an evidence-based project, it is essential to understand the culture of the organization in order to begin assessing its readiness for EBP implementation.
- Complete the “Organizational Culture and Readiness for System-Wide Integration of Evidence-Based Practice Survey,” located in the textbook appendix.
- Develop an analysis of 250 words from the results, addressing your organization’s readiness level, possible project barriers and facilitators, as well as how to integrate clinical inquiry.
- Make sure to include the rationale for the survey categories scores that were significantly high and low, incorporating details and/or examples. Also explain how to integrate clinical inquiry into the organization, providing strategies that strengthen the organizations weaker areas.
- Submit a summary of your results. The actual survey results do not need to be included.
Please follow this format:
Introduction
Organization Preparedness Level
Barriers and Facilitators
Clinical Inquiry
Rationale for Survey Category Scores
Strategies That Will Strengthen the Weak Areas
No conclusion is needed
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, revise “Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment” for your final paper submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.
Rubric
Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment
| 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% |
2 Less than Satisfactory 80.00% |
3 Satisfactory 88.00% |
4 Good 92.00% |
5 Excellent 100.00% |
||
| 100.0 %Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment | ||||||
| 100.0 % Describe the results from the Organizational Culture and Readiness for System-Wide Integration of Evidence Practice Survey addressing the readiness level of your organization. Provide an analysis of any possible project barriers and facilitators, and describe how to integrate clinical inquiry into your organization. | The survey results are listed without an in-depth explanation. Analysis of the project barriers and facilitators is not outlined or is outlined poorly. Clinical inquiry is defined and/or broad statements are made about it, but the individual organization being assessed is not specifically addressed. Inaccurate comprehension of material is revealed, as is the lack of ability to apply information. Subject matter is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | The survey results are listed without an in-depth explanation. The project barriers and facilitators are ignored or superficially evaluated. Unwarranted conclusions are drawn. Clinical inquiry is defined and/or broad statements are made about it, but the individual organization being assessed is not specifically addressed. A lack of comprehension is displayed, but there is an attempt to apply information. There is weak, marginal coverage of subject matter with large gaps in presentation. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | A basic survey overview is provided, but any rationale, details, and/or examples are minimally included. A surface level of evaluation of the possible project barriers and facilitators is conducted. Very narrow focus is provided. Claims and ideas of the criteria are supported but not developed in-depth. How to integrate a basic idea of clinical inquiry into the organization is explained but does not specifically address the individual organization being assessed. Comprehension of the material is exhibited and there is clearly an attempt to integrate and apply information. All subject matter is covered in minimal quantity and quality. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | Information in relation to the survey categories which scored high and low on the survey is provided. The rationale for the scores, including details and/or examples, is stated. Analysis on the project barriers and facilitators is direct, competent, and appropriately aligned to the survey. How to integrate a basic idea of clinical inquiry into the organization is explained, and strategies that broadly encompass many issues of concern are provided. Integrative and accurate comprehension is demonstrated and information is applied as appropriate. There is comprehensive coverage of subject matter. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. | Detailed information in relation to the survey categories that scored high and low on the survey is provided. The rationale for the scores, including details and/or examples, is provided. The major project barriers and facilitators are thoughtfully analyzed and evaluated. Warranted conclusions are drawn. An informed position on how to integrate clinical inquiry into the organization is developed and explained, providing strategies which align to the weaker areas of the organization. Clarity and specificity of comprehension are demonstrated, and all relevant information is synthesized. Coverage extends beyond what is needed to support subject matter. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | |
| 100 % Total Weightage | ||||||
