Evidence-Based Practice Proposal: Section G: Evaluation of Process
Details:
In 500-750 words (not including the title page and reference page), develop an evaluation plan to be included in your final evidence-based practice project. Provide the following criteria in the evaluation, making sure it is comprehensive and concise:
- Describe the rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data.
- Describe the ways in which the outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives are achieved.
- Describe how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence. Address validity, reliability, and applicability.
- Describe strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results.
- Describe implications for practice and future research.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine “Section G: Evaluation” for your final submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.
Introduction
Rationale for Evaluation Process
Methods of Evaluation
Statistical Tools
Strategies In Case of Failure
Implications
Conclusion
Rubric
Apply Rubrics
Evidence-Based Practice Proposal: Section G: Evaluation of Process
| 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% |
2 Less than Satisfactory 80.00% |
3 Satisfactory 88.00% |
4 Good 92.00% |
5 Excellent 100.00% |
||
| 100.0 %Evaluation | ||||||
| 100.0 % Develop an evaluation plan. Describe the rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data, the ways in which the outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives were achieved, and how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence. Address validity, reliability, and applicability. Describe strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results and the implications for practice and future research. | Evaluation plan presents the method used in the measurement of the outcomes but does not align the project objectives and/or evidence. The rationale is missing. Modification strategies as well as the impact to future research may or may not be present with minimal details. Subject matter is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Evaluation plan presents the methods used in the measurement of the outcomes according to the project objectives and/or evidence. The rationale is missing. The information presented is ambiguous. Modification strategies as well as the impact to future research may or may not be present with minimal details. A lack of comprehension is displayed, but there is an attempt to apply information. There is weak, marginal coverage of subject matter with large gaps in presentation. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | Evaluation plan presents the rationale for and the methods used in the measurement of the outcomes according to the project objectives and evidence. The information presented may lack cohesiveness and details. Possible project modifications when outcomes do not provide expected results are listed. The implications for practice and future research are broadly described. Comprehension of the material is exhibited and there is clearly an attempt to integrate and apply information. All subject matter is covered in minimal quantity and quality. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | Evaluation plan presents the rationale for and the methods used in the measurement of the outcomes according to the project objectives and evidence. Validity, reliability, and applicability are briefly addressed. Strategies for project modification when outcomes do not provide expected results are outlined. Implications for practice and future research are broadly described. Integrative and accurate comprehension is demonstrated and information is applied as appropriate. There is comprehensive coverage of subject matter. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. | Evaluation plan presents the rationale and the methods used in the measurement of the outcomes according to the project objectives and evidence. The information presented is aligned, comprehensive, and addresses validity, reliability, and applicability. The plan formulates clear and precise strategies for project modification when outcomes do not provide expected results. An informed position on the implications for practice and future research is developed and explained. Clarity and specificity of comprehension is demonstrated and all relevant information is synthesized. Coverage extends beyond what is needed to support subject matter. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | |
| 100 % Total Weightage | ||||||
