Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section C: Literature Support
In order to work on this order assignment the one that Section B assignment needs some corrections. Please follow the comment made by the instructor for a proper correction.
Hi, please find attached your reviewed and scored Section. Overall, a good job but there are a number of errors found and highlighted for your attention and correction. All factual content must be cited and you will need to add more supporting references/citations to this section to substantiate that there is indeed a problem in need of investigation; need more evidence and present a PICOT question rather than the PICOT format. Please let me know of questions.
I might need at least a total of 275 words added to it. And please as the instructor requested add more to the reference lists please. Follow my Picot question and make correction please. For your info I am a Registered Nurse, I am the quality control nurse in jail detention center, I am doing my MSN/leadership. I appreciate all you do to make me successful in this class. Thanks
Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section C: Literature Support
Details:
To begin, work through the reference list that was created in the \”Section B: Problem Description\” assignment in Topic 2. Appraise each resource using the \”Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklists,\” available in the textbook appendix. The specific checklist you use will be determined by the type of evidence within the resource.
Develop a research table to organize and summarize the research studies. Using a summary table allows you to be more concise in your narrative description. Only research studies used to support your intervention are summarized in this table. Refer to the \”Evaluation Table Template,\” available in the textbook appendix. Use the \”Evaluation Table Template\” as an adaptable template.
Write a narrative of 825 words (not including the title page and references) that presents the research support for the projects problem and proposed solution. Make sure to do the following:
An Introduction is needed
1. Include a description of the search method (e.g., databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit your criteria).
2. Summarize all of the research studies used as evidence. The essential components of each study need to be described so that readers can evaluate its scientific merit, including study strengths and limitations.
3. Incorporate a description of the validity of the internal and external research.
It is essential to make sure that the research support for the proposed solution is sufficient, compelling, relevant, and from peer-reviewed professional journal articles.
Although you will not be submitting the checklist information or the evaluation table you design in Topic 3 with the narrative, the checklist information and evaluation table should be placed in the appendices for the final paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine \”Section C: Literature Support\” for your final submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.
Apply Rubric: Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section C: Literature Support
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00% 2
Less than Satisfactory
80.00% 3
Satisfactory
88.00% 4
Good
92.00% 5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Literature Support
100.0 % Summarize the research support for the problem and proposed solution of the project. Describe the search method. Summarize all of the research studies used as evidence. Describe research strengths and limitations as well as the validity of the internal and external research. Provide sufficient, compelling, relevant research from peer-reviewed professional journals. The individual research support for the problem and proposed solution of the project is listed without an in-depth explanation. The search method data are listed without details. Analysis of the research strengths and limitations is not outlined or is outlined poorly. The research support may not be relevant and/or may not be from peer-reviewed professional journals. Inaccurate comprehension of material is revealed, as is the lack of ability to apply information. Subject matter is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. The individual research support for the problem and proposed solution of the project is listed without an in-depth explanation. The search method data are listed and identify some but not all of the databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit the criteria. The research strengths and limitations are ignored or superficially evaluated. Unwarranted conclusions are drawn. The research support may not be relevant and/or may not be from peer-reviewed professional journals. A lack of comprehension is displayed, but there is an attempt to apply information. There is weak, marginal coverage of subject matter with large gaps in presentation. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. A basic overview of the individual research support for the problem and proposed solution of the project is provided. Any rationale, details, and/or examples of the validity of the internal and external research are minimally included. The search method data are listed and identify some but not all of the databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit the criteria. A surface level of evaluation of the research strengths and limitations is conducted. Very narrow conclusions are provided. The research support is relevant and from peer-reviewed professional journals. Comprehension of the material is exhibited and there is clearly an attempt to integrate and apply information. All subject matter is covered in minimal quantity and quality. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. A complete summary of the individual research support for the problem and proposed solution of the project is provided in a concise manner. The validity of the internal and external research is described while providing some detailed rationale. The search method is described and identifies the databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit the criteria. The research strengths and limitations are analyzed, providing direct, competent, and appropriate conclusions. The research support is relevant and from peer-reviewed professional journals. Integrative and accurate comprehension is demonstrated and information is applied as appropriate. There is comprehensive coverage of subject matter. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. A detailed summary of the individual research support for the problem and proposed solution of the project is provided and emphasizes the essential components. The validity of the internal and external research is described in-depth. The search method is described and identifies the databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit the criteria. The research strengths and limitations are thoughtfully analyzed while evaluating the research strengths and limitations and drawing warranted conclusions. The research support is sufficient, compelling, relevant, and from peer-reviewed professional journals. Clarity and specificity of comprehension are demonstrated, including the synthesizing of all relevant information. Coverage extends beyond what is needed to support subject matter. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
