Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section E: Change Model
View Rubric
Details:
In 500-750 words (not including the title page and reference page), apply a change model to the implementation plan. Include the following:
- Roger’s diffusion of innovation theory is a particularly good theoretical framework to apply to an EBP project. However, students may also choose to use change models, such as Duck’s change curve model or the transtheoretical model of behavioral change. Other conceptual models presented such as a utilization model (Stetler’s model) and EBP models (the Iowa model and ARCC model) can also be used as a framework for applying your evidence-based intervention in clinical practice.
- Apply one of the above models and carry your implementation through each of the stages, phases, or steps identified in the chosen model.
- In addition, create a conceptual model of the project. Although you will not be submitting the conceptual model you design in Topic 5 with the narrative, the conceptual model should be placed in the appendices for the final paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine “Section E: Change Model” for your final submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.
Introduction
Precontemplation
Contemplation
Preparedness
Action
Maintenance
Conclusion
Rubric
Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section E: Change Model
| 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% |
2 Less than Satisfactory 80.00% |
3 Satisfactory 88.00% |
4 Good 92.00% |
5 Excellent 100.00% |
||
| 100.0 %Change Model | ||||||
| 100.0 % Apply a change model to the implementation plan. Carry the implementation plan through each of the stages, phases, and/or steps identified in the chosen model. | Implementation plan is loosely connected to a change model. Inaccurate comprehension of material is revealed, as is the lack of ability to apply information. Subject matter is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Implementation plan is loosely connected to the chosen change model. Identification, interpretation, and evaluation of the change model are not presented comprehensively and/or may be ambiguous at times. A lack of comprehension is displayed, but there is an attempt to apply information. There is weak, marginal coverage of subject matter with large gaps in presentation. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | Interpretation and evaluation of the change model are not presented comprehensively and may be ambiguous at times. A basic description of the implementation plan through the stages, phases, and/or steps identified in the chosen model is provided. Comprehension of the material is exhibited and there is clearly an attempt to integrate and apply information. All subject matter is covered in minimal quantity and quality. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | Analysis and evaluation draw warranted use of the specified change model, and rationale is appropriately supported. A detailed outline of the implementation plan through each of the stages, phases, and/or steps identified in the chosen model is provided. An individual interpretation on the effectiveness of the model in relation to the implementation plan is presented, but it lacks depth. Integrative and accurate comprehension is demonstrated and information is applied as appropriate. There is comprehensive coverage of subject matter. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. | Analysis and evaluation draw warranted use of the specified change model, and rationale is appropriately supported. A detailed descriptive narrative of the implementation plan through each of the stages, phases, and/or steps is provided, as is a solid interpretation of the change model in relation to the implementation plan. Appropriate evaluation of the effectiveness of the model is provided, demonstrates clarity and specificity of comprehension, and synthesizes all relevant information. Coverage extends beyond what is needed to support subject matter. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | |
| 100 % Total Weightage | ||||||
