The use of antidiabetic medication, Semaglutide, in type II diabetes patients Does it improve blood glucose levels?

The use of antidiabetic medication, Semaglutide, in type II diabetes patients Does it improve blood glucose levels?
PICO question:
“Do Type II diabetes patients who received insulin injections (Semaglutide) once a week have improved blood glucose levels than those who receive daily insulin injections?”
***MUST HAVE 5 PEER-REVIEWED REFERENCES***
PICO PAPER INSTRUCTIONS

You will formulate a clinical question using the PICO model. The question should target a specific patient population (e.g., elderly home-bound or postsurgical adults who had a specific surgical procedure) or audience (e.g., staff members), and identify a clinical dilemma commonly faced at a clinical practice site.

A 7-page paper is due on the dates listed above. The paper, in APA style, should be guided by your PICO question. The paper will include an analysis of evidence with a minimum of 5 peer-reviewed studies that provide the evidence to answer your PICO question. These articles will be no more than 5 years old and from relevant and respected primary sources. Please the grading rubric for

PREPARING THE ASSIGNMENT:

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of this assignment.

1. The assignment should be no less than 7 pages and no more than 8 pages (excluding title and reference pages and appended evidence tables).

2. The assignment will include the following components:

a. Title Page

b. Introduction

1. Purpose Statement

2 . Practice problem and PICO Question identification and description 3. Role of the Appraisal of Evidence to Address the Selected Practice Problem

4 . Role of the Evidence Synthesis of Literature to Address the Practice Problem

Practice Problem and Question

1. Significance

2. Prevalence

3. Practice Problem Questions in PICOT Format

Evidence Synthesis of Literature to Address the Selected Practice Problem

1. Scope of the Evidence Synthesis

2. Main Points of Each Source 3. Comparison of Main Points across Sources

3. Comparison of Main Points across Sources

Appraisal of the Evidence to Address the Selected Practice Problem

1. Quality

2. Magnitude

3. Quantity

4. Consistency

5. Applicability

Conclusion

1. Impact of the Practice Problem

2. Appraisal of Evidence to Address the Selected Practice Problem  External validity, generalizability, applicability, and relevance

3. Evidence Synthesis to Address the Practice Problem

4. Translation Path

g. Summary Tables of Evidence to Address the Selected Practice Problem using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Evidence Summary Tool

1. Article #

2. Author and Date:

3. Evidence Type:

4. Sample, Sample Size, and Setting

5. Study findings that help answer the EBP question

6. Limitations

7. Evidence Level and Quality h.

APA Style and Organization

1. APA Standards for Scholarly Papers 

Level I Headings for the Following o Practice Problem and Question

o Evidence Synthesis of Literature

o Appraisal of the Evidence

o Translation Path into Practice

o Conclusion

o Summary Tables of the Evidence

2. Grammar and Mechanics

3. Paper is 6-8 Pages (excluding Title and Reference Pages and appended Summary Tables)

4. Uses Required Evidence Summary Table

The use of antidiabetic medication, Semaglutide, in type II diabetes patients Does it improve blood glucose levels? Related Posts: