|
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00% |
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00% |
3
Satisfactory
75.00% |
4
Good
85.00% |
5
Excellent
100.00% |
95.0 %Content |
|
20.0 % Description of Organizational or Program Strengths |
No identification of strengths of the practicum organization or program is provided or evident. |
Incomplete or insufficiently developed list of the practicum organization or program strengths is provided but lacks clear analysis or depth. |
Minimal list of the practicum organization or program strengths is provided. Some analysis of the issue is evident. |
Demonstrates a good understanding of key strengths of the practicum organization or program in a well-developed list. |
Displays excellent comprehensive list of the practicum organization or program strengths. It is evident the student has a strong grasp and understanding of the issues presented. |
|
20.0 % Description of Organizational or Program Weaknesses |
No identification of weaknesses of the practicum organization or program is provided or evident. |
Incomplete or insufficiently developed list of the practicum organization or program weaknesses is provided but lacks clear analysis or depth. |
Minimal list of the practicum organization or program weaknesses is provided. Some analysis of the issue is evident. |
Demonstrates a good understanding of key weaknesses of the practicum organization or program in a well-developed list. |
Displays excellent comprehensive list of the practicum organization or program weaknesses. It is evident the student has a strong grasp and understanding of the issues presented. |
|
20.0 % Description of Organizational or Program Opportunities |
No identification of opportunities of the practicum organization or program is provided or evident. |
Incomplete or insufficiently developed list of the practicum organization or program opportunities is provided but lacks clear analysis or depth. |
Minimal list of the practicum organization or program opportunities is provided. Some analysis of the issue is evident. |
Demonstrates a good understanding of key opportunities of the practicum organization or program in a well-developed list. |
Displays excellent comprehensive list of the practicum organization or program opportunities. It is evident the student has a strong grasp and understanding of the issues presented. |
|
20.0 % Description of Organizational or Program Threats |
No identification of threats of the practicum organization or program is provided or evident. |
Incomplete or insufficiently developed list of the practicum organization or program threats is provided but lacks clear analysis or depth. |
Minimal list of the practicum organization or program threats is provided. Some analysis of the issue is evident. |
Demonstrates a good understanding of key threats of the practicum organization or program in a well-developed list. |
Displays excellent comprehensive list of the practicum organization or program threats. It is evident the student has a strong grasp and understanding of the issues presented. |
|
15.0 % SWOT Analysis Questions |
No response to the analysis questions is provided or evident. |
Incomplete or insufficiently developed responses to analysis questions are provided but there is a lack of critical analysis of issues. |
Minimal responses to analysis questions are provided. Critical analysis is evident in responses. |
Well-developed responses to analysis questions are provided and demonstrate a good understanding of the issues presented. |
Displays excellent comprehensive responses to analysis questions. It is evident the student has a strong grasp and understanding of the issues presented. |
|
5.0 %Organization and Effectiveness |
|
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. |
Some mechanical errors or typos are present but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. |
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. |
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
|
100 % Total Weightage |
|
|