Scholar paper NR 351 1 & 2, Chamberlain University
NR351_Scholarly Paper Phase 1
NR351_Scholarly Paper Phase 1
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Title Page
Title page adheres very well to the format of the assigned required template.
5.0 pts
Title page adheres very well to APA format (0-1 errors).
4.0 pts
Title page adheres mostly well to APA format (2 errors).
3.0 pts
Title page somewhat adheres to APA format (3 errors).
2.0 pts
Title page does not adhere well to APA format (4-5 errors).
0.0 pts
No title page OR more than 5 errors.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Margins, Headings, Headers, Font, Spacing
Margins, headings, headers, font, and spacing adhere well to APA format and the assigned required template.
5.0 pts
Margins, headings, headers, font, and spacing adhere well to APA format.
4.0 pts
Margins, headings, headers, font, and spacing adhere fairly well to APA format.
3.0 pts
Adherence of margins, headings, headers, font, and spacing to APA format.
2.0 pts
Margins, headings, headers, font, and spacing adhere poorly to APA format.
0.0 pts
Headings not used and paper is single spaced with incorrect font and margins.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Assigned Article Summary
Clearly summarizes the major content of the assigned article using 175-200 words. Content includes main ideas from across the entire article. Specifics are excellent. Content is attributed to the correct source.
50.0 pts
Clearly summarizes the major content of the assigned article using 175-200 words. Content includes main ideas from across the entire article. Specifics are excellent. Content is attributed to the correct source.
44.0 pts
Summarizes the major content of the assigned article using 175-200 words. Content includes main ideas from across the entire article. Specifics are good. Content is attributed to the correct source.
40.0 pts
Vaguely summarizes the content of the assigned article. OR uses slightly fewer than 175 words or slightly more than 200 words. OR Content may or may not include main ideas from across the entire article. Specifics are fair. All content may not be attributed to the correct source.
19.0 pts
May not sufficiently summarize content of the assigned article. OR uses significantly fewer than 175 words or significantly more than 200 words. OR Content may not include main ideas from across the entire article. Specifics are poor. Content is not be attributed to the correct source.
0.0 pts
Did not use the assigned article.
50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Impact on Your Future Practice
Clearly states how learning from the article will impact your future practice is 125-150 words, concise, clearly relates article contents to practice. Uses first person.
50.0 pts
Clearly states how learning from the article will impact your future practice is 125-150 words, concise, clearly relates article contents to practice. Uses first person.
44.0 pts
States how learning from the article will impact your future practice is 125-150 words, concise, relates article contents to practice in a mostly clear manner. Uses first person.
40.0 pts
Vaguely states how learning from the article will impact your future practice OR uses slightly fewer than 125 words or slightly more than 150 words OR article contents related to practice in a fair manner. May or may not use first person.
19.0 pts
May not sufficiently state how content of the article impacts your future practice OR uses significantly fewer than 125 words or significantly more than 150 words. OR article contents related to practice in a poor manner. Specifics are poor. OR does not use first person.
0.0 pts
Did not provide statements required in this section.
50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reference for Assigned Journal Article
See page 198 in APA Manual and page 5 from Chamberlain Guidelines for Writing Professional Papers
10.0 pts
Reference for the assigned article is typed using correct APA format including: author(s), year, article title, journal name, volume number, issue number, page numbers, italics, parentheses, punctuation, double line spacing, and hanging indent. Include DOI if available. Minimal or no errors (0–1 error).
9.0 pts
Reference for the assigned article is typed using APA format including the items at left with 2–3 errors.
8.0 pts
Reference for the assigned article is typed using APA format including the items at left with 4-5 errors.
4.0 pts
Reference typed with 6-8 errors in APA format from the items at left
0.0 pts
Reference is not for the assigned article OR APA format includes more than 8 errors
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quotation(s) and Citation
See pages 170-171 and 177 in APA Manual and page 5 from Chamberlain Guidelines for Writing Professional Papers
10.0 pts
Types 1 or 2 quotations (10–20 words) from assigned article using correct APA citation including quotation marks, authors’ names, year, page numbers, and parentheses with no errors or one minor error. Did not use words or ideas that the authors cited from another source.
9.0 pts
Types 1 or 2 quotations (10–20 words) from assigned article using APA citation including items at left with 2–3 minor errors. Did not use words or ideas that the authors cited from another source.
8.0 pts
Quotation slightly too long or too short. OR Types a quotation (10–20 words) from assigned article using APA citation with 4-5 errors. Did not use words or ideas that the authors cited from another source. OR used 3 quotations.
4.0 pts
Quotation excessively too long or too short, or quoted selected words or ideas the author(s) of the assigned article cited from another source, or 6-7 errors in APA format. OR used 4 or more quotations.
0.0 pts
More than 7 errors in APA quotation format. OR no quotations provided.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Paraphrased Areas and Citations
See pages 171 and 177 in APA Manual and page 5 from Chamberlain Guidelines for Writing Professional Papers
10.0 pts
Types appropriately paraphrased version of specific ideas from assigned article using correct APA citation including authors’ names, year, and parentheses with 0-1 error.
9.0 pts
Types mostly appropriately paraphrased version of the specific ideas from assigned article using correct APA citation including authors’ names, year, and parentheses with 2–3 errors in paraphrasing or citation.
8.0 pts
Types minimally appropriately paraphrased version of the specific ideas from assigned article using APA citation including authors’ names, year, and parentheses with 4-5 errors.
4.0 pts
Poorly paraphrased version and/or APA citation with 6 or more errors OR citation missing for paraphrased ideas.
0.0 pts
Copied several sequential words from article without quotation marks and/or citation. No clearly paraphrased areas.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Mechanics and Organization
Excellent mechanics and organization.
10.0 pts
Excellent mechanics and organization with minimal errors of the following: - well organized and logical, - correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling, - professional wording is used, - uses complete sentences, - paragraphs are linked together logically, and main ideas expressed
9.0 pts
Good mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the first column. A few minor errors noted.
8.0 pts
Fair mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the first column. Some errors noted.
4.0 pts
Poor mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the first column. Many errors noted.
0.0 pts
Very poor mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the first column such that writing is difficult to follow or understand.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Late Deduction
0.0 pts
0 points deducted
Submitted on time.
0.0 pts
Not Submitted on Time - Points deducted
1 day late= 7.5 deduction; 2 days late= 15 deduction; 3 days late= 22.5 deduction; 4 days late= 30 deduction; 5 days late= 37.5 deduction; 6 days late= 45 deduction; 7 days late= 52.5 deduction
0.0 pts
