PICOT: In the acute care setting, what is the effect of the bedside nursing report on patient safety as compared to the traditional reporting methods in six months?
This is a continuation of the Course Project please see attached paper and make sure this ties into what is already written.
• Review the information in Chapter 5 of the course text, focusing on the steps for conducting a literature review and for compiling your findings.
Using this PICOT question; The most feasible question was found to be “In the acute care setting, what is the effect of the bedside nursing report on patient safety as compared to the traditional reporting methods in six months? PICOT is an acronym for patient, intervention, comparison, and outcome. “P” (or population) in this case would be patients in the emergency room. The “I” (or intervention) would be the use of bedside nursing report. The “C” is the comparison of the current reporting process to the bedside shift report. The “O” (or outcome) is improved patient safety and satisfaction. The “T” would be the time of six months observation.
• locate 5 or more full-text research articles that are relevant to your PICOT question. Include at least 1 systematic review and 1 integrative review if possible. Use the search tools and techniques mentioned in your readings this week to enhance the comprehensiveness and objectivity of your review. You may gather these articles from any appropriate source, but make sure at least 3 of these articles are available as full-text versions through Walden Library’s databases. Read through the articles carefully. Eliminate studies that are not appropriate and add others to your list as needed. Although you may include more, you are expected to include a minimum of five articles. Complete a literature review summary table using the Literature Review Summary Table Template that is attached as well as the template for proper APA format.
Develop a 3-4 page literature review that includes the following:
• A synthesis of what the 5 studies you found reveal about the current state of knowledge on the question that you developed
o Point out inconsistencies and contradictions in the literature and offer possible explanations for inconsistencies.
• Preliminary conclusions on whether the evidence provides strong support for a change in practice or whether further research is needed to adequately address your inquiry
• Your literature review summary table with all references formatted in correct APA style
The literature review is a critical piece in the research process because it helps a researcher determine what is currently known about a topic and identify gaps or further questions. Conducting a thorough literature review can be a time-consuming process, but the effort helps establish the foundation for everything that will follow. Note: Certain aspects of conducting a standard review of literature have not yet been covered in this course. Therefore, while you are invited to critically examine any aspect of the studies (e.g., a study’s design, appropriateness of the theoretic framework, data sampling methods), your conclusion should be considered preliminary. Bear in mind that five studies are typically not enough to reflect the full range of knowledge on a particular question and you are not expected to be familiar enough with research methodology to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of all aspects of the studies.
These are the resources already used
Alvarado, K., Lee, R., Christoffersen, E., Fram, N., Boblin, S., Poole, N., … & Forsyth, S. (2006). Transfer of accountability: transforming shift handover to enhance patient safety. Healthcare Quarterly, 9(Sp
Davies, K. (2011). Formulating the evidence-based practice question: A review of the frameworks. Evidence based library and information practice, 6(2), 75-80. Retrieved from https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/index.php/EBLIP/article/viewFile/9741/8144
Improving America’s Hospitals: The Joint Commission’s Annual Report on Quality and Safety. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/6/2007_Annual_Report.pdf
Landrigan, C. P., Parry, G. J., Bones, C. B., Hackbarth, A. D., Goldmann, D. A., & Sharek, P. J. (2010). Temporal trends in rates of patient harm resulting from medical care. New England Journal of Medicine, 363(22), 2124-2134, https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsa1004404
Polit, D. and Beck, C. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer
Riesenberg, L. A., Leisch, J., & Cunningham, J. M. (2010). Nursing handoffs: a systematic review of the literature. AJN The American Journal of Nursing, 110(4), 24-34, https://doi.org/10.1097/01.naj.0000370154.79857.09
Rolling, H., Pauley, J., & Hoyt, J. (2015). IN THE ACUTE CARE SETTING WHAT IS THE EFFECT OF BEDSIDE NURSING REPORT ON PATIENT SAFETY WHEN COMPARED WITH TRADITIONAL REPORTING METHODS: An Evidence-Based Project, http://hdl.handle.net/10755/560967
Scott, R. D. (2009). The direct medical costs of healthcare-associated infections in US hospitals and the benefits of prevention. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/hai/pdfs/hai/scott_costpaper.pdf
Spivey, J. (2014). Where do you want to give report? Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 33(5), 278-279, https://doi.org/10.1097/dcc.0000000000000064
