The health care system in the U.S. is comprised of a complex combination of public as well as private programs. The system contains both insured and uninsured entities seeking its services. Besides, the U.S. hosts diverse individuals who possess health care insurance coverage. Most of the insurance owners are members of an employer-sponsored venture. The federal government is responsible for insurance covers for both the poor and retired individuals. On the other hand, Great Britain's health care system is financed by the UK's government through the National Health Service (NHS). Through the funds, each entity within the state is guaranteed topnotch health services. This essay seeks to explore the USA health care system and Great Britain's health system while analyzing the comparable features in both countries.
The US's healthcare system is comprised of affordable care act and Medicaid insurance coverage for its population. The insurance coverage aims at availing essential care to children, unemployed individuals, and the retired citizens in the state. Both Medicaid and Medicare are programs that are tailored to serve the needy (Peter et al,. 2016). For instance, Medicaid offers not only insurance for the poor but also children as well as underprivileged pregnant women. Medicaid and Medicare programs are funded by the government, which ensures that healthcare in the U.S. remains prioritized. Obama Care is a comprehensive health reform that was enacted in the year 2010. The main goal of ACA law was to improve the number of individuals who received affordable health insurance. Also, Obama Care aimed to broaden the Medicaid program to low-income adults. Eventually, the program aids other healthcare delivery methods in lowering the costs of healthcare.
Another program in the US is the children's health insurance program, which ensures children obtain affordable health care services (Peter et al,. 2016). As for Great Britain, the national health services provide health coverage for its citizens. The health system ensures that healthcare is accessible to everyone. Therefore, children, unemployed personnel, and retired groups of individuals need not worry about the payment of the bill for services in the hospital as they are fully covered.
The United States spends a significant amount of its gross domestic product on drugs and pharmaceuticals as compared to Great Britain. Besides, the U.S. invests its capital on the vulnerable groups only while the rest of the population is responsible for their health. In Great Britain, health is free for all, which prompts the government to accumulate more capital to finance the health care system. In both U.S. and Great Britain, for a patient to be referred to a specialist, the primary health care provider ascertains the disease nature and the severity (Peter et al,. 2016). The rates of referral to specialists in the U.S. are higher compared to referrals in Great Britain. Referrals aim at facilitating specialized care for the patient to improve their outcome.
The U.S. government works towards the insurance of health complications such as cardiac conditions, hypertensive to mention just but a few. The U.K. facilitates the coverage of variable conditions. Besides, all the ailments are offered an equal chance of health coverage through the NHS. Great Britain's coverage benefits its patients a great deal as compared to the United States. It is depicted by the free services offered by the U.K.'s National Health Service (Peter et al,. 2016). The patients make partial payments for their health coverage through taxation.
In summary, both the health care system in the U.S and Great Britain are dynamic. The US healthcare system ensures that the underprivileged citizens are insured. Besides, Medicare and Obama offer extensive healthcare services to its citizens. As for Great Britain's health system, NHS facilitates health services for all of its citizens.
References
Peter, R., Soika, S., & Steinorth, P. (2016). Health insurance, health savings accounts and healthcare utilization. Health economics, 25(3), 357-371.h
