Change Model Powerpoint
Dummy order – Continued pages for order 110817 powerpoint on Change Models- Supervisor Robin had send me an email that I had not added enough pages for this power point assignment of 15-20 slides. below is a rubrics for this assignment , again
Benchmark – Change Initiative: Develop a Change Model
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00% 2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00% 3
Satisfactory
79.00% 4
Good
87.00% 5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Content
10.0 % Evaluate the Need for Change Methods used to evaluate the need for change are not included. Methods used to evaluate the need for change are incomplete or incorrect. Methods used to evaluate the need for change are included but lack explanation and supporting details. Methods used to evaluate the need for change are complete and include explanation and supporting details. Methods used to evaluate the need for change are extremely thorough and include extensive explanation and numerous supporting details.
10.0 % Choosing Individuals or Teams for Change Initiative Approach and criteria for choosing individuals or teams necessary for a change initiative are not included. Approach and criteria for choosing individuals or teams necessary for a change initiative are incomplete or incorrect. Approach and criteria for choosing individuals or teams necessary for a change initiative are included but lack clear explanation. Approach and criteria for choosing individuals or teams necessary for a change initiative are complete and clearly explained. Approach and criteria for choosing individuals or teams necessary for a change initiative are expertly crafted.
10.0 % Communication Strategies Communication strategies are not included. Communication strategies are incomplete or incorrect. Communication strategies are included but are inconsistent with the organizational culture and behavior and/or lack detail and explanation. Communication strategies are completely detailed and explained and consistent with the organizational culture and behavior. Communication strategies are extremely detailed and well explained and align seamlessly with the organizational culture and behavior.
10.0 % Stakeholder Support and Overcoming Resistance Strategies to gather stakeholder support and over come resistance are not included. Strategies to gather stakeholder support and over come resistance are incomplete or incorrect. Strategies to gather stakeholder support and over come resistance are included but lack clear explanation. Strategies to gather stakeholder support and over come resistance are complete and clearly explained. Strategies to gather stakeholder support and over come resistance are expertly crafted.
10.0 % Implementation Strategies Implementation strategies are not included. Implementation strategies are incomplete or incorrect. Implementation strategies are inconsistent with the organizational culture and behavior and/or lack detail and explanation. Implementation strategies are completely detailed and explained and consistent with the organizational culture and behavior. Implementation strategies are extremely detailed and well explained and align seamlessly with the organizational culture and behavior.
10.0 % Sustainability Strategies Sustainability strategies are not included. Sustainability strategies are incomplete or incorrect. Sustainability strategies are inconsistent with the organizational culture and behavior and/or lack detail and explanation. Sustainability strategies are completely detailed and explained and consistent with the organizational culture and behavior. Sustainability strategies are extremely detailed and well explained and align seamlessly with the organizational culture and behavior.
5.0 % Graphic Organizer: Visual Appeal and Clarity of Change Model The change model is not presented using a graphic organizer. The change model is presented using a graphic organizer. Presentation of change model uses garish color or the typographic variations are overused and legibility suffers. Background interferes with readability. Understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships is limited within the chosen design. The change model is presented using a graphic organizer, but the design does not clearly illustrate the intended change model. Elements do not consistently contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. There is some variation in type size, color, and layout of the graphic design used. The change model is presented using a graphic organizer that illustrates the change model. Visual connections mostly contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships of the change model. Differences in type size or color are used well and consistently. The change model is presented using a graphic organizer that clearly illustrates the change model. Appropriate and thematic graphic elements are used to make visual connections that contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size or color are used well and consistently.
10.0 % Presentation of Content on PowerPoint The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Little persuasive information is included. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Some persuasive information is included The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other. The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Persuasive information from reliable sources is included. The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating rationale and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
5.0 % PowerPoint Layout The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
10.0 % Research No outside sources were used to support the change model. Few outside sources were used to support the change model. Limited research is apparent to provide support or rationale for the change model. Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness. General support and rationale is presented for the change model. Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. Adequate support and rationale is presented for the change model. Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. Strong support and rationale is presented for the change model.
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
5.0 % Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 % Total Weightage
