Assignment 3 (Part II): Community Health Promotion Plan Proposal
Instructions
This assignment assesses the following intended course outcomes:
1.Apply the nursing process and evidence-based practice to accurately assess family and community health systems.
2.Apply systematic research practices to identify family and community health system needs.
3.Develop appropriate risk reduction and health promotion education plans based on identified family and community risk factors.
4.Discuss the multi-dimensional role of the community health nurse in risk reduction and health promotion
After you have completed the windshield survey, ecomap, and agency visit, you should then identify a need in the community and develop a plan to address the need.
•This plan will utilize the data collected from the windshield survey, ecomap, and agency interview.
•Please include information about the group most affected by the community need and the prevalence of the need in the community.
•Conduct a complete literature review on the topic and state your recommendations based on the findings (what types of programs are successful). The paper should be no longer than five pages (excluding title page and reference list) and be in APA format.
•Develop a plan to address the identified need based on your findings from the literature.
•Be sure to consider how you will implement and evaluate your program.
Your plan should identify the following:
•Identified community need: description of the need based on data collected from the windshield survey, ecomap, and agency interview.
•Epidemiology of the community need: statistical data supporting the choice (can be presented as a table). You can find this data by accessing such sites as Healthy People 2020, the CDC, the US Census Bureau, and Vital Statistics, which were presented in Weeks 2 and 3.
•Literature review: Summarize the findings from the literature that provide evidence on how to address the community need (do not list each article individually, synthesize the findings). Explain the research data which supports your program (based on examples of the studies you read about).
•Identification of available resources: List the resoures you found during your windshield survey, ecomap, and agency visit that are currently available and that address this need. What is the rationale for a new program if one already exists? Explain what gaps in services have been identified.
•Recommendations: Based on the information from the data you collected, and the identified community resources, what recommendations would you make for implementing a community plan of care?
As you develop your plan, remember to consider how you would implement and evaluate the outcome of the interventions. Your implementation and evaluation plan will be due in two weeks.
This assignment will be graded on the following criteria:
Identified community need
20%
Epidemiology of the community need (prevalence, group most affected)
20%
Literature review
20%
Identification of available resources in the community and gaps in services needed to address the need
15%
Recommendations (based on literature review and assessment of available resources)
20%
APA, spelling, grammar, and paper organization
5%
Due Date
Feb 11, 2018 11:59 PM
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Community Health Promotion Plan Proposal
Criteria
Level 4
Level 3
Level 2
Level 1
Identified Community Need
20 points
(16-20 points)
Need is clearly identified and rationale clearly states that is an important issue in the community
15 points
(11-15 points)
Need is clearly identified and rationale is somewhat clear as to how it is related to an important issue in the community.
10 points
(6-10 points)
Need is ambiguous and rationale is somewhat clear as to how it is related to an important issue in the community.
5 points
(0-5 points)
Need is ambiguous and there is no rationale as to how it is an important issue in the community.
Epidemiology
20 points
(16-20 points)
Information includes statistics on group most affected, prevalence in the community, risk factors and impact on the community.
15 points
(11-15 points)
Information includes statistics on group most affected. Lacks information on either prevalence in the community, risk factors or impact on the community
10 points
(6-10 points)
Information includes statistics on group most affected. Lacks most of the information on prevalence in the community, risk factors or impact on the community
5 points
(0-5 points)
Incomplete information on statistics. Lacks information on prevalence, risk factors and impact on community
Literature Review
20 points
(16-20 points)
Related to the issue, relevant, current and from peer-reviewed journals.
15 points
(11-15 points)
Somewhat related to the issue. Articles are relevant, current and from peer-reviewed journals.
10 points
(6-10 points)
Peripherally related to the issue. Articles are relevant, current and some are from peer-reviewed journals.
5 points
(0-5 points)
Not related to issue. Articles and not relevant, may or may not be current and not from peer-reviewed journals
Resources
15 points
(12-15 points)
Identifies available community resources and states gaps in needed services
11 points
(8-11 points)
Identifies resources, states gaps in services, that are somewhat related to the community need
7 points
(4-7 points)
Little information on community resources and/or gaps in services are not clearly related to the identified community need
3 points
(0-3 points)
Community resources and gaps in services are not identified or are not related to the identified community need.
Recommendations
20 points
(16-20 points)
Clearly defines intervention that is clinically relevant, evidence-based and describes the implications for nursing practice
15 points
(11-15 points)
Clearly defines intervention that is clinically relevant, evidence-based, does not describes the implications for nursing practice
10 points
(6-10 points)
Clearly defines intervention that is clinically relevant, evidence-based, does hot describes the implications for nursing practice
5 points
(0-5 points)
Does not clearly defines intervention, is not clinically relevant, evidence-based, and does not describes the implications for nursing practice
APA, spelling, grammar and organization
5 points
(5 points)
Excellent use of APA in formatting and referencing. Excellent spelling and grammar throughout the paper. Excellent organization and easy to read.
4 points
(4 points)
Minimal (1-2) mistakes in APA formatting. Appropriate referencing. Minimal mistakes in spelling and grammar. Well written and easy to read
3 points
(2-3 points)
Some APA (more than 2 types) and referencing mistakes. Some spelling and grammar errors. Generally well written and easy to read. Minimal organization problems
1 point
(0-1 point)
Many APA, spelling, and grammar mistakes throughout the paper. Difficult to read with very little organization
Overall Score
Level 4
76 or more
Level 3
51 or more
Level 2
25 or more
Level 1
0 or more
